Comparison of Tests Used to Diagnose Leptospirosis in Dogs

Diagnostic Test

Pros

Cons

False Positives

False Negatives

Comments

Microscopic agglutination test (MAT)

Widely available

  • Commercial laboratory only

  • Requires live organisms

  • Cross-reactions may confuse interpretation

  1. Vaccination

  2. Exposure without disease

Early in the course of acute disease

Acute and convalescent titers recommended

Point-of-care immunochromatographic test for IgM antibodiesa

  • Patient-side test

  • Rapid results

No numerical titer

Recent vaccination

Uncommon

Positive at low MAT titers

Point-of-care ELISA for antibodies against LipL32b

  • Patient-side test

  • Rapid results

No numerical titer

Vaccination

Early in the course of acute disease

Often negative with low MAT titers

Laboratory ELISAc

Does not require live organisms

No numerical titer

Vaccination

Early in the course of acute disease

--

PCR assay

  • Rapid results

  • Available at veterinary laboratories

  • Validated for use in dogs

Not serogroup specific

  1. Subclinical carriers

  2. Dead organisms

  3. Contamination

  1. Low leptospire numbers

  2. Intermittent shedding

Most useful when combined with serological testing

Bacterial culture

Directly demonstrates presence of the organism

  • Technically demanding

  • Not widely available

  • Long turnaround time

Organisms can be isolated from body fluids of healthy animals

  • Antimicrobial therapy

  • Timing of sampling

  • Technical difficulties

Not often used clinically

aZoetis WITNESS® Lepto

bIDEXX SNAP® Lepto Test

cDetects same antibodies as the SNAP® test