PROFESSIONAL VERSION

Encephalomyocarditis Virus Infection in Animals

Full Review: Aug 2026 ByAndrew B Allison, MS, PhD, Department of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida | Peer reviewed byJoão Brandão, LMV, DECZM (Avian), DACZM, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University
Last updated: Aug 2026
v3274984

Encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) is a rodent-borne picornavirus that is a global pathogen, causing fatal disease in mammalian species, most notably zoo animals and domestic swine. EMCV affects primarily the cardiopulmonary system, with the heart as a primary target; CNS involvement can also occur. Definitive diagnosis is based on virus isolation, RT-PCR assay, and genetic sequencing. Disease can be mitigated by autogenous vaccination and robust rodent control and abatement procedures.

Encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) is a rodent-borne pathogen, primarily of zoological animals and domestic swine, that has a worldwide distribution. It is a member of the family Picornaviridae, genus Cardiovirus, and is thus a single-stranded, positive-sense, nonenveloped RNA virus (1).

EMCV has been commonly recovered from numerous mammalian hosts, including rodents, carnivores, primates, ungulates, marsupials, and elephants (2). It has also been detected in birds and in arthropod vectors such as mosquitoes and ticks; however, no evidence suggests that it is normally associated with birds or is arthropod borne, and these infections are considered incidental (3, 4).

Rats and mice are believed to be the normal reservoir hosts of EMCV (5, 6). Although the virus is zoonotic, human EMCV infections are generally subclinical or are associated with mild to moderate symptoms (7). No human deaths resulting from EMCV infection have been reported.

The disease caused by EMCV (encephalomyocarditis) is named for its predilection for infecting the CNS and the cardiovascular system in experimental studies in mice, and both neurotropic and cardiotropic strains have been defined (8). In domestic swine and zoo animals, however, acute and subacute deaths are usually attributed to the effects of the virus on the myocardium—ie, cardiac insufficiency and pulmonary edema resulting in frothy fluid in the respiratory tract (9, 10).

Strains of EMCV that target the pancreas and cause diabetes in mouse studies have also been recognized (5); however, the importance of these findings for other mammals has not been established.

Epidemiology of Encephalomyocarditis Virus Infection

Although encephalomyocarditis virus isolates from various geographical regions might differ in pathogenicity, previously all EMCVs were considered to exist as a single serotype (EMCV-1). However, an EMCV variant first isolated from a wood mouse (Apodemus Leviticus) in Germany in 2005 was distinguished from EMCV-1 by serological testing and has been designated as EMCV-2 (11).

EMCV-1 infects a wide variety of animal hosts; the host range and pathogenicity of EMCV-2 remain to be determined. Putative additional types (EMCV-3 through EMCV-5) have been reported in the literature; however, these have been based on genetic/phylogenetic divergence rather than on antigenic testing, so only two serotypes (EMCV-1 and EMCV-2) are recognized currently (11, 12).

EMCV infection in nonrodent mammalian species has often been attributed to spillover from populations of wild mice and rats (13). In experimental infections of rodents, the virus is shed primarily in feces and urine, and such shedding is presumed to occur under natural conditions as well (14, 15).

Shedding of EMCV by rodents can contaminate food, water, and bedding material of larger mammals (13). Ingestion of infected rodents might be another means of infection.

Domestic swine shed EMCV in nasal secretions and feces during the first 3 days of experimental infection, and the virus can be transmitted to other pigs by direct contact during this time (16).

EMCV is resistant to adverse environmental conditions and can remain infectious for weeks to months (2).

Clinical Findings of Encephalomyocarditis Virus Infection

Swine infected with encephalomyocarditis virus might die acutely at any age as a result of myocardial failure or might have abortions in late pregnancy, fetal mummification, and apparent reproductive failure. A mortality rate approaching 100% has been described in suckling swine; the mortality rate becomes progressively lower in older animals (10).

With the recognition of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in North America in 1987, the overall importance of EMCV as a cause of reproductive disease in swine has been questioned. The high mutation rate of PRRSV complicates the maintenance of a reliable diagnostic RT-PCR assay, and virus isolation is time-consuming and challenging (17). Similar tests for EMCV are more straightforward for a diagnosis.

Most outbreaks of EMCV infection have been associated with captive animals in zoos, swine production units, and primate research centers. Sudden death is often the first indication of infection (13).

Pearls & Pitfalls

  • Sudden death is often the first indication of infection with encephalomyocarditis virus.

Clinical signs of EMCV infection can include fever, anorexia, listlessness, trembling, staggering, dyspnea, and paralysis. EMCV is known to cross the placenta in swine and has been recovered from fetuses in cases of reproductive failure due to abortions in later stages of pregnancy; stillbirths and mummification can also occur (18, 19).

Reproductive problems due to EMCV infection have been reported to involve sows of all parities, often persisting in affected herds for months (20).

A variety of exotic mammals have been fatally infected with EMCV in zoological parks primarily in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia. Affected animals prominently include, but are not limited to, elephants, rhinoceroses, hippopotamuses, and various ungulates and nonhuman primates (eg, chimpanzees, orangutans, baboons, lemurs, monkeys) (2, 12, 21, 22).

An incident of lion deaths at a zoo in the US was apparently associated with feeding of an African elephant carcass that had died as a result of EMCV infection (23).

Although the vast majority of reported wildlife deaths attributed to EMCV infection have been associated with animals in zoological facilities, an encephalomyocarditis outbreak in Kruger National Park in South Africa in 1993–1994 resulted in the deaths of 65 free-ranging elephants (24).

Reports of disease outbreaks due to EMCV are solicited and recorded at the Pirbright Institute in the UK.

Pathological Findings of Encephalomyocarditis Virus Infection

In typical cases of encephalomyocarditis virus infection, gross examination often reveals circular to linear pale or hemorrhagic foci in the myocardium (9, 20, 25). Some lesions can be necrotic, particularly in cases of acute death. However, changes can be subtle and obscured by postmortem autolysis. 

Pulmonary edema with excessive fluid in the pleural, pericardial, and/or peritoneal cavities is often noted in EMCV cases (see ) (12, 20, 25). During histological examination, these lesions might be evident as necrosis and lysis of the sarcoplasm with variable mineralization and lymphocytic infiltration (20).

Microscopic EMCV lesions of the CNS can include meningeal inflammation, perivascular cuffing of the cerebral cortices and hippocampi, and neuronal degeneration with gliosis (26).

Diagnosis of Encephalomyocarditis Virus Infection

  • Virus isolation

  • RT-PCR assay

  • Genetic sequencing

  • Serological testing

Because the pale necrotic heart muscle lesions that can occur in fatal encephalomyocarditis virus infections are also evident in septic infarction or vitamin E/selenium deficiency, a definitive diagnosis via genetic sequencing is required. Genetic sequencing can be performed by RNA extraction from infected tissues (eg, heart) or, alternatively, from virus isolated in cell culture from tissue homogenates, followed by RT-PCR assay and Sanger sequencing.

Fresh or frozen tissues may be used for EMCV isolation, and tissue selection may be guided by histopathological lesions. Heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, and/or brain samples are often collected from acutely dead animals or aborted fetuses.

Baby hamster kidney (BHK) and African green monkey kidney (Vero E6) cells—both interferon-deficient cell lines—are routinely used for EMCV isolation (12). Ancillary methods, such as immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization, can be useful in localizing viral antigen or RNA, respectively, to observed microscopic lesions.

Serological diagnosis via virus neutralization, hemagglutination inhibition, or ELISA is possible if acute and convalescent sera are collected; however, the frequency of subclinical EMCV infections limits the diagnostic value of testing single serum samples. Plaque reduction neutralization testing is the gold standard for determining neutralizing antibody titers. Blood for testing African elephants, believed to be highly susceptible to fatal EMCV infection, can be sampled from ear veins (see ).

Treatment, Control, and Prevention of Encephalomyocarditis Virus Infection

  • Minimizing exposure to infected wild rats and mice

  • Implementing additional rodent mitigation strategies during outbreaks

  • Inactivating virus through disinfection

  • Protecting animals via autogenous vaccines

There is no specific treatment for encephalomyocarditis virus infection; however, the morbidity and mortality rates can be minimized by protecting at-risk animals from stress and excitement. EMCV appears to cyclically infect rodents and is most likely to affect swine and zoo animals when rodent populations are observed to increase above base levels. Rodent control is thus critical to minimize the exposure of susceptible species.

Instituting rodent mitigation strategies such as decreasing harborage and potential food sources, as well as increasing pest management efforts when necessary, is recommended, as is prompt and proper disposal of infected animals that have died (12).

EMCV is inactivated by the judicious use of many disinfectants labeled for use on production animals. The virus is destroyed by heat treatment at 60°C (140°F) for 30 minutes or by the use of disinfectants containing chlorine, iodine, or mercuric chloride (27).

Killed vaccines for the prevention of myocarditis in weaned swine have been patented but are no longer commercially available in the US, except as autogenous products. The current impetus for vaccine development has come largely from zoological facilities, where EMCV infection has remained a substantial problem.

Success with use of a genetically engineered, live attenuated virus vaccine against EMCV has been reported in primates, domestic swine, and various zoological species (28, 29).

Commercial EMCV vaccine production has been limited by the apparent lack of need in most domestic animal production situations.

Zoonotic Risk of Encephalomyocarditis Virus Infection

EMCV has rarely been recognized as a cause of human disease, and the severe myocarditis and acute fatal infections observed in many animal species have not been observed in human cases. Nevertheless, serological survey data indicate that EMCV infections in humans are common in many parts of the world (30); most are likely asymptomatic and/or undiagnosed.

Symptoms of EMCV infection in humans can include fever, chills, malaise, headache, photophobia, nausea, and vomiting (7).

Key Points

  • Encephalomyocarditis virus can cause sudden death from myocardial destruction in swine of any age; however, death is most common in young animals.

  • EMCV can also cause abortion in late stages of pregnancy, fetal mummification, and apparent reproductive failure in swine.

  • Spillover of EMCV into many zoo animals because of contamination of food and water supplies by infected rodent feces and urine has caused considerable mortality.

  • EMCV infections have been reported in humans but generally do not cause overt disease.

For More Information

References

  1. Racaniello VR. Picornaviridae: the viruses and their replication. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, eds. Fields Virology. Vol 1. 6th ed. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013:453-489.

  2. Zimmerman JJ. Encephalomyocarditis. In: Beran GW, ed. Handbook of Zoonoses. Section B: Viral. 2nd ed. CRC Press; 1994:423-436.

  3. Causey OR, Shope RE, Laemmert H. Report of an epizootic of encephalomyocarditis virus in Pará, Brazil. Rev Serv Esp Saude Publ. 1962;12(1):47-50. https://iah.iec.gov.br/iah/fulltext/memo_iec/v7p103-106.pdf

  4. Tesh RB, Wallace GD. Observations on the natural history of encephalomyocarditis virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;27(1 Pt 1):133-143. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1978.27.133

  5. Doi K. Experimental encephalomyocarditis virus infection in small laboratory rodents. J Comp Pathol. 2011;144(1):25-40. doi:10.1016/j.jcpa.2010.05.001

  6. Kishimoto M, Hang’ombe BM, Hall WW, Orba Y, Sawa H, Sasaki M. Mastomys natalensis is a possible natural rodent reservoir for encephalomyocarditis virus. J Gen Virol. 2021;102(3). doi:10.1099/jgv.0.001564

  7. Oberste MS, Gotuzzo E, Blair P, et al. Human febrile illness caused by encephalomyocarditis virus infection, Peru. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(4):640-646. doi:10.3201/eid1504.081428

  8. Craighead JE. Pathogenicity of the M and E variants of the encephalomyocarditis (EMC) virus. I. Myocardiotropic and neurotropic properties. Am J Pathol. 1966;48(2):333-345. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4285783

  9. Thomson GR, Bengis RG, Brown CC. Picornavirus infections. In: Williams ES, Barker IK, eds. Infectious Diseases of Wild Mammals. Iowa State University Press; 2001:119-130.

  10. Joo, HS. Encephalomyocarditis virus. In: Straw BE, D’Allaire S, Mengeling WL, Taylor DJ, eds. Diseases of Swine. 8th ed. Iowa State University Press; 1999:139-144.

  11. Philipps A, Dauber M, Groth M, et al. Isolation and molecular characterization of a second serotype of the encephalomyocarditis virus. Vet Microbiol. 2012;161(1-2):49-57. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.07.006

  12. Adhikari A, Feng KH, Shrestha A, et al. Zoological transmission of encephalomyocarditis virus in the United States: virus evolution, host ecology, and capsid antigenicity derived from an outbreak. PLoS Pathog. 2026;22(2):e1013861. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1013861

  13. Backues KA. Encephalomyocarditis virus infection in zoo animals. In: Fowler ME, Miller RE, eds. Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine: Current Therapy. 6th ed. Saunders; 2008:75-78,cp1. doi:10.1016/B978-141604047-7.50012-9

  14. Spyrou V, Maurice H, Billinis C, et al. Transmission and pathogenicity of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) among rats. Vet Res. 2004;35(1):113-122. doi:10.1051/vetres:2003044

  15. Vanella JM, Kissling RE, Chamberlain RW. Transmission studies with encephalomyocarditis virus. J Infect Dis. 1956;98(1):98-102. doi:10.1093/infdis/98.1.98

  16. Billinis C, Paschaleri-Papadopoulou E, Anastasiadis G, et al. A comparative study of the pathogenic properties and transmissibility of a Greek and a Belgian encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) for piglets. Vet Microbiol. 1999;70(3-4):179-192. doi:10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00145-5

  17. Tian X, Wang H, Liu Z, et al. The updated duplex fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR assay for simultaneous detection of PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025;15:1616898. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1616898

  18. Koenen F, De Clercq K, Lefebvre J, Strobbe R. Reproductive failure in sows following experimental infection with a Belgian EMCV isolate. Vet Microbiol. 1994;39(1-2):111-116. doi:10.1016/0378-1135(94)90091-4

  19. Joo HS, Kim HS, Leman AD. Detection of antibody to encephalomyocarditis virus in mummified or stillborn pigs. Arch Virol. 1988;100(1-2):131-134. doi:10.1007/BF01310915

  20. Vansteenkiste K, Van Limbergen T, Decaluwé R, Tignon M, Cay B, Maes D. Clinical problems due to encephalomyocarditis virus infections in two pig herds. Porcine Health Manag. 2016;2:19. doi:10.1186/s40813-016-0036-z

  21. Nederlof RA, Koo B-S, Arqueros CS, et al. Encephalomyocarditis virus in non-domesticated species. Pathogens. 2025;14(4):397. doi:10.3390/pathogens14040397

  22. Reddacliff LA, Kirkland PD, Hartley WJ, Reece RL. Encephalomyocarditis virus infections in an Australian zoo. J Zoo Wildl Med. 1997;28(2):153-157. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9279403

  23. Gaskin JM, Jorge MA, Simpson, CF, et al. The tragedy of encephalomyocarditis virus infection in zoological parks of Florida. Proc Am Assoc Zoo Vet. 1980:1-7. https://rhinoresourcecenter.com/library/references/the-tragedy-of-encephalomyocarditis-virus-infection-in-zoological-parks-of-florida

  24. Grobler DG, Raath JP, Braack LE, et al. An outbreak of encephalomyocarditis-virus infection in free-ranging African elephants in the Kruger National Park. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1995;62(2):97-108. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8600443

  25. Wells SK, Gutter AE, Soike KF, Baskin GB. Encephalomyocarditis virus: epizootic in a zoological collection. J Zoo Wildl Med. 1989;20(3):291-296. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20094963

  26. Brewer LA, Lwamba HC, Murtaugh MP, Palmenberg AC, Brown C, Njenga NK. Porcine encephalomyocarditis virus persists in pig myocardium and infects human myocardial cells. J Virol. 2001;75(23):11621-11629. doi:10.1128/JVI.75.23.11621-11629.2001

  27. Koenen F. Encephalomyocarditis virus. In: Straw BE, D’Allaire S, Zimmerman JJ, Taylor DJ, eds. Diseases of Swine. 9th ed. Blackwell Science; 2006:331-336.

  28. Osorio JE, Hubbard GB, Soike KF, et al. Protection of non-murine mammals against encephalomyocarditis virus using a genetically engineered Mengo virus. Vaccine. 1996;14(2):155-161. doi:10.1016/0264-410x(95)00129-o

  29. Backues KA, Hill M, Palmenberg AC, Miller C, Soike KF, Aguilar R. Genetically engineered Mengo virus vaccination of multiple captive wildlife species. J Wildl Dis. 1999;35(2):384-387. doi:10.7589/0090-3558-35.2.384

  30. Tesh RB. The prevalence of encephalomyocarditis virus neutralizing antibodies among various human populations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;27(1 Pt 1):144-149. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1978.27.144

quizzes_lightbulb_red
Test your Knowledge nowTake a Quiz!
iOS ANDROID
iOS ANDROID
iOS ANDROID